Compare
Miravela or Krea: which one for a brand or an agency?
Krea is a wide creative suite — 50+ models, a node canvas, custom training on faces, products and styles, and plugins for the Adobe tools — built for making. Miravela is built for running a campaign: it starts from the brief, runs twelve hand-picked models at maximum quality with the brand kit applied, and takes the selection to client approval and delivery. Choose Krea for model range and custom training; choose Miravela when a campaign has to be approved and delivered.
What Krea does well
As of 8 November 2026, krea.ai lists 50+ image, video and 3D models, a node system to chain models into workflows that can be shared as apps, LoRA training on a face, a product or a style (up to 2,000 images on its higher plans), plugins for Photoshop, After Effects, Illustrator, Premiere, DaVinci Resolve and Blender, a public API and a hosted MCP server. Its enterprise page adds a shared brand library, a no-training commitment, SOC 2 and self-hosting of its own model.
If your team trains its own models and lives in the Adobe tools, that depth is real and Miravela does not match it.
What Miravela does that Krea does not
Miravela starts before the prompt: you paste a brief and the agent turns it into concepts and prompts, after naming what must stay identical across the series (product, face, logo). It ends after the generation: a shared selection, a private portal per brand where the client comments and approves from a private link, and delivery into the subscriber’s own Google Drive. The brand kit is applied to every generation, every model runs at its maximum quality on every plan, credits are in euros with no per-model surcharge, data is hosted in the European Union, and the prompt history of every visual is exportable.
Where Miravela is honestly behind
Miravela is a curated platform, not a toolbox. It runs twelve hand-picked image and video models rather than forty or fifty, has no node canvas, no plugins for Adobe or Figma, and no custom model or character training: consistency comes from brand kits, references and custom agents. If model range and custom training are your criteria, Krea is the better fit today.
| Miravela | Krea | |
|---|---|---|
| Starts from a brief (parsing, concepts, prompts) | Yes, built-in agent | — |
| Image and video models | 12, hand-picked, maximum quality on every plan | 50+, image, video and 3D |
| Node canvas | No | Yes |
| Brand consistency | Brand kit applied automatically; references; custom agents (Signature) | LoRA training on faces, products, styles; brand library (enterprise) |
| Client review and approval | Private portal per brand; comments come back inside the platform | — |
| Delivery | Download, ZIP, Google Drive sync | Download; Adobe and Blender plugins |
| Pricing model | Credits in euros, same price whatever the model; packs that don’t expire while subscribed | Free daily units; tiers with compute units that vary by model; business and enterprise plans |
| Data | EU hosting (Paris); no training on client content | No training on your data (business, enterprise); region not stated |
| Developer access | MCP connector for Claude | API, Agent API, MCP |
Questions people ask
- Can our client approve visuals on Krea?
- Krea’s public pages describe shared workspaces and roles for teams, but no client-facing review or approval flow. On Miravela, each brand gets a private portal where the client comments and approves, and the comments come back inside the platform.
- Does Miravela train custom models like Krea?
- No. Miravela keeps products, faces and styles consistent with brand kits and reference images carried into every prompt, not with model training. If you need a trained model of a product or a person, Krea offers it.
- Can we use both?
- Yes. Some teams explore and train on Krea and run client campaigns, approval and delivery on Miravela. Miravela exports every visual and its prompt history.